🔗 Share this article

The disputed, US and Israel-backed Gaza relief foundation announces it is terminating its aid operations in the affected area, after almost six months.

The group had already suspended its multiple aid distribution centers in Gaza following the ceasefire between Hamas and Israel took effect six weeks ago.

The organization attempted to avoid UN systems as the primary provider of aid to Gaza's population.

International relief agencies declined to participate with its methodology, stating it was unethical and unsafe.

Numerous Gazans were fatally wounded while seeking food amid turbulent circumstances near the foundation's locations, primarily from Israeli forces, based on UN documentation.

Israel said its soldiers fired cautionary rounds.

Operation Conclusion

The foundation announced on recently that it was winding down operations now because of the "successful completion of its emergency mission", with a aggregate of 3 million parcels containing the equivalent of more than 187 million meals provided to residents.

The GHF's executive director, Jon Acree, additionally stated the United States-operated coordination body - which has been set up to help implement US President Donald Trump's Gaza peace plan - would be "taking over and developing the system the foundation tested".

"The organization's system, in which Palestinian factions were unable to divert and benefit from humanitarian assistance, had major impact in getting Hamas to the table and achieving a ceasefire."

Comments and Positions

Hamas - which denies stealing aid - supported the shutdown of the GHF, as indicated by media.

An official from declared the organization should be held accountable for the harm it caused to Palestinians.

"We request all international human rights organisations to ensure that it does not escape accountability after causing the death and injury of thousands of Gazans and covering up the starvation policy employed by the Israeli authorities."

Organization Timeline

The foundation started work in Gaza on late May, a seven days following Israel had partially eased a comprehensive closure on relief and commercial goods to Gaza that continued for 77 days and caused severe shortages of essential supplies.

Subsequently, a famine was declared in the Palestinian urban center.

The GHF's food distribution sites in southern and central Gaza were administered by United States-based protection companies and located inside regions under Israeli military authority.

Humanitarian Concerns

The UN and its partners claimed the methodology breached the core assistance standards of non-partisanship, even-handedness and self-determination, and that channelling desperate people into armed forces regions was inherently unsafe.

The UN's human rights office reported it tracked the killing of at least 859 Palestinians attempting to obtain nourishment in the vicinity of GHF sites between 26 May and 31 July.

An additional 514 individuals were lost their lives close to the routes of UN and other aid convoys, it added.

The greater part of these people were lost their lives due to the Israeli military, according to the office.

Conflicting Accounts

Israel's armed services stated its soldiers had discharged cautionary rounds at people who approached them in a "menacing" manner.

The organization declared there were no shooting events at the relief locations and alleged that United Nations of using "untrue and confusing" statistics from the Palestinian health authority administered by Hamas.

Future Implications

The foundation's prospects had been uncertain since Palestinian factions and Israeli authorities consented a truce agreement to implement the first phase of the United States' reconciliation proposal.

The arrangement specified aid distribution would take place "free from intervention from the involved factions through the international bodies and their affiliates, and the Red Crescent, in combination with other worldwide bodies not linked whatsoever" with militant groups and the Israeli government.

United Nations representative the UN spokesman said on Monday that the organization's termination would have "zero effect" on its operations "as we never partnered with them".

The official further mentioned that while increased relief was entering the region since the ceasefire took effect on early October, it was "insufficient to meet all the needs" of the over two million inhabitants.