🔗 Share this article

Do your professional networking connections recognizing you as a thought leader? Do numerous commenters applauding your advice on expanding your venture? Are headhunters making contact to explore collaborations?

If not, the reason might be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender for Better Visibility

Numerous female professionals participated in a collective professional network test this week after viral posts suggested that switching their profile gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Other testers modified their profiles to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "revolutionize" and "expedite". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in the platform's system prioritizes men who use online business jargon.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to determine which posts are shown to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent company announcement, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not consider "demographic information" when deciding post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "hundreds of signals" affect how content perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your content shows up in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported remarkable outcomes.

"The numbers I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in visitor traffic and a 1,300% increase in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a communications strategist, started testing after noticing her audience decrease significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her gender to "male"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her profile using "masculine-oriented" wording
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with similar "agentic" style

The outcome was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within one week.

The Negative Aspect

Despite the success, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my content were softer - brief and insightful, but also friendly and human," she explained. "Now, the bro-coded version was assertive and confident - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, stating "Every day I continued, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Not all testers experienced positive results. One writer who changed both her gender to "man" and her race to "Caucasian" described a reduction in reach and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or the reasons behind it," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with ongoing conversations about LinkedIn's unique role as both a business platform and community site.

Recent changes in recent months have reportedly caused women professionals experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to unofficial tests where identical content by male and female users received vastly different audience engagement.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and distribute content based on various elements, including post content and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it frequently assesses its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

Company representative suggested that current reductions in certain members' visibility might stem from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Evolving Environment

According to a tester noted, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the network.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she commented. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly competitive and less controlled."